Samsung SyncMaster 213T 21" LCD Monitor (Silver)
[Archived in $0 - $1000, $900 - $1000, 19-Inch, Products, Samsung]
Manufacturer: Samsung
Price at amazon.com: $921.49Usually ships in 24 hours
Used & new from $898.50
List price $2,339.00
- High 1,600 x 1,200 resolution and fine 0.27 mm dot pitch
- Dual digital and analog inputs for maximum versatility
- Wide 170-degree viewing angles
- 250 nits of brightness, sharp 500:1 contrast ratio
- 2-year warranty; PC and Mac compatible
Product Description:
The Samsung SyncMaster 213T combines versatile viewing and connectivity options with powerful image performance. With sharp 1,600 x 1,200 resolution, 250 nits of brightness, and a 500:1 contrast ratio, images appear rich and clear. Dual inputs allow for digital and analog connectivity, and a stylish modern silver design completes the package. Viewable at up to 170 degrees (horizontal and vertical), pivot enabled (landscape and portrait orientations) and wall mountable, the viewing configurations are seemingly limited only by imagination. The PC and Mac compatible Samsung SyncMaster 213T comes backed by a two-year warranty on parts and labor.
From the Manufacturer The SyncMaster 213T defines digital excellence. Your search for the ultimate multi-purpose monitor is over. The high precision SyncMaster 213T offers a full 21.3-inch viewable display, designed to meet any user's needs with ease. Thrill your senses with a digital interface that delivers the highest quality video possible. With both analog and digital input sources, all of your images will be smooth, flicker-free, and crystal clear. The amazing SyncMaster 213T adds flare to any application, and... read more
Viewable at up to 170 degrees (horizontal and vertical), pivot enabled (landscape and portrait orientations) and wall mountable, the viewing configurations are seemingly limited only by imagination. The PC and Mac compatible Samsung SyncMaster 213T comes backed by a two-year warranty on parts and labor.Average Customer Rating:
Comment: Great Bang for Buck Rating:
I've owned this monitor for almost 3 months now and think its the best purchase I've made in a long time. The size of the monitor, the resolution, and the ability to rotate are just some of its great features. I use it for various reasons, but I was suprised how great it is with games. I play graphic intensive games and I notice absolutely no refresh rate problems that apply to many lcds. I notice no differece between it and my old crt's refresh rate. I researched buying a new large lcd and found that this was the best bang for the buck. You will especially enjoy it if you think, as I do, that Bigger is Better!
Comment: Good buy Rating:
I use this monitor exclusively for gaming. It's hooked up via DVI-D to an nVidia GeForce FX 5950 card. I have nothing bad to say about the monitor's performance - the games I play look spectacular with it.
I am used to a Sony Trinitron 19" CRT and now, when I look at the CRT alongside this Samsung LCD? The CRT looks terrible :)
Best part of this Samsung LCD? The blacks are REALLY black. When I use xterms the clarity of the text is out of this world.
If you can afford ~$1200, I really recommend this monitor to anyone.
Comment: Wish I researched Samsung's replacement policy before buying Rating:
Bought two of these monitors about two weeks ago. Both came with several dead pixels right next to each other forming an annoying blimp on the screen. Samsung agreed to replace both units. However, when the replacements arrived today, they turned out to be refurbished and with MUCH greater problems. One had a horrible color problem where one edge of the screen has one shade and the other another. Much worse when looked at from an angle. Another replacement was too dim even with brightness set to 100. Both refurbished monitors had many dead pixels. Apparently, this is acceptable to Samsung.
Beware! Samsung will only replace with refurbished monitors, so if yours comes defective, you are out of luck trying to replace for a new unit.
Needless to say, I will never buy Samsung again.
Posted at November 11, 2003 12:27 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)


